* Introduce AspiringActor, EstablishedActor
This pair of objects represents the two-phase (parent-thread /
child-thread) construction that's needed to support constructing
Thread<Object> without blocking until the child thread is up and
running.
An `AspiringActor<O>` is responsible for:
- ownership of the actor's `Mailbox`
- allocating the memory for (but *not* constructing) the target object `O`
Using these two pieces--the mailbox and a stable address for `O`--an
`AspiringActor<O>` can accept messages for the target object, or provide
`ActorRef<O>`s that do so, before the object has actually been
constructed by the corresponding `EstablishedActor<O>`. (Such messages
are queued in the mailbox until after the object is constructed.)
This allows for an `AspiringActor<O>` to be created and safely used by a
thread other than the one on which the target object will (eventually)
live.
An `EstablishedActor<O>` is responsible for managing the lifetime of the
target object `O` and the open/closed state of the parent's `mailbox`.
The `O` object's lifetime is contained by that of its owning
`EstablishedActor<O>`: the `EstablishedActor` constructor executes the
`O` constructor via "placement new", constructing it at the address
provided by the parent `AspiringActor`, and the `~EstablishedActor`
destructor similarly executes the `~O` destructor (after closing the
mailbox). `EstablishedActor` should therefore live entirely on the
thread intended to own `O`.
* Remove Actor#{invoke,ask}
* Tile timing
* Refactor logging code
* Keep the scope of `messageStream` constrained
* Make log message more clear
* Fix crash issue if onlineResponse.data is null
Before this change, we've tried to open the database in read/write, but not create mode. In situations where the database didn't exist yet, this logged an error to the console, and we proceeded to opening it again in read/write/create mode, which actually created the file. The reason we did this is so that we could detect really old caching databases from January 2016 in case a developer upgraded from an older SDK (iOS v3.1 and earlier, Android v3.2 and earlier) that didn't have https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-gl-native/pull/3715 yet.
However, these error messages, while innocent, look scary in the console and some users suspect that it's a bug. This change opens the file directly in read/write/create mode, omitting the first failed attempt. To handle old cache databases, we're now deleting the `http_cache` table, which was the only table in those old databases, and create the new schema, rather than deleting the entire file and recreating the Database object. In most scenarios, this will lead to one fewer opening attempt, while the database migration will continue to work for the few users who upgrade all the way from a January 2016 SDK.
Additionally, this fixes a mismatch between the Qt and non-Qt implementation: Qt doesn't support opening a file in read/write mode without the create flag. This means that we've seen a different control flow on Qt compared to the non-Qt implementation when opening a database.
Unfortuntely, it's difficult to avoid all exceptions, because sqlite3_open_v2 does not reliably return SQLITE_NOTADB if the file is not a database. However, this should avoid cases where developers misinterpret the SQLITE_CANTOPEN exception as a crash, which is the common case.
Core test uses stubbed "glyph.pbf" without Chinese glyphs
Darwin test relies on locally available "PingFang" font.
Android test relies on locally available "Droid" font. 'expected.png' is NOT correct b/c I haven't figured out how to run unit tests on Android yet.
- Platform-specific LocalGlyphRasterizer is responsible for deciding which glyphs to rasterize locally and for implementing the rasterization.
- Default platform implementation doesn't locally generate any glyphs -> no behavior change
- Unit test uses StubLocalGlyphRasterizer, which returns a single fixed bitmap for all CJK glyphs
- Rename glyph_loader.test to glyph_manager.test
Because a message we queue from the foreground may cause the background to complete, exit, and tear down the AsyncTask, we have to block queue processing until we've finished our call to AsyncTask::send().
Broadening the scope of a mutex is scary, but I audited the code of our four implementations of AsyncTask and I don't see any way this could cause a deadlock.
