# NavSea Object Taxonomy Manual Review

## 1 Review Objective

This package is for manual confirmation of the current NavSea object taxonomy derived from the `pbf_analysis` database snapshot in this workspace.

The review focuses on confirming:

- canonical object type naming
- family grouping
- detection grouping
- geometry unification or splitting
- ambiguous object handling

The current pipeline already separates source-preserved render layers, semantic object layers, and detection-oriented object taxonomy. This review package highlights the places where human confirmation is still needed before treating the taxonomy as stable.

## 2 Review Priority Groups

### Priority A - Immediate navigation safety relevance

Hazards, wrecks, rocks, reefs, dangerous obstacles, navigation marks, route controls, anchorage controls, restricted areas, and fishery hazards that can affect collision, grounding, or entanglement decisions.

### Priority B - Navigation context / operational relevance

Boundaries, facilities, subsea cables and pipelines, piers, floating structures, and other contextual objects that matter to operations even when they are not direct collision targets.

### Priority C - Background / rendering objects

Labels, bathymetry support layers, clip layers, land masks, and other source-preserved layers that may be rendering support rather than semantic end objects.

## 3 Manual Review Candidate Table

| review_priority | layer_name | class_name | shape_name | vt_layer | observed_geom_types | total_feature_count | suggested_canonical_object_type | suggested_canonical_family | suggested_detection_class | suggested_review_reason | needs_manual_review |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A | 航行危険障害物 | 暗岩 |  | p航行危険障害物 | Point | 10,366 | 暗岩 | hazard | obstacle | Direct grounding hazard; confirm whether rock / reef subtyping should remain separate from generic obstacle handling. | YES |
| A | 航行危険障害物 | 洗岩 |  | p航行危険障害物 | Point | 3,323 | 洗岩 | hazard | obstacle | High-salience grounding hazard; confirm stable canonical naming under hazard family. | YES |
| A | 航行危険障害物 | 干出岩 |  | p航行危険障害物 | Point | 1,178 | 干出岩 | hazard | obstacle | Intertidal hazard object with clear navigation relevance; confirm whether it stays separate from other rock hazards. | YES |
| A | 投錨注意障害物 | 険悪物 |  | p投錨注意障害物 / P投錨注意障害物 | Point, Polygon, MultiPolygon | 26,836 | 険悪物 | hazard | obstacle | Same object appears as point and area; confirm whether symbolic and areal forms should be unified or split. | YES |
| A | 投錨注意障害物 | 魚礁 |  | p投錨注意障害物 / P投錨注意障害物 | Point, Polygon, MultiPolygon | 16,608 | 魚礁 | hazard | obstacle | Artificial reef can imply fishery semantics or navigation hazard; family assignment needs human confirmation. | YES |
| A | 航路標識点 |  | 灯 (Lt) | p航路標識群 | Point | 14,936 | 灯 (Lt) | navigation_aid | navigation_mark | Core navigation mark subtype; confirm whether light subtypes should be normalized under a broader canonical lighthouse / light object. | YES |
| A | 航路標識点 |  | 防波堤灯台 | p航路標識群 | Point | 4,679 | 防波堤灯台 | navigation_aid | navigation_mark | Shape-driven subtype may be a naming variant of a broader light / lighthouse family. | YES |
| A | 錨泊地等 |  |  | p錨泊地等 / P錨泊地等 | Point, Polygon | 234 | 錨泊 (指定)地 | anchorage | anchorage | Same anchorage concept appears as symbol and area; confirm whether annotation and area extent should remain one object type. | YES |
| A | 施設・境界線等 | 港則法による境界 |  | L741 | LineString, MultiLineString | 1,696 | 港則法による境界 | boundary | boundary_control | Regulatory meaning affects route compliance and alerting; boundary family and detection role should be confirmed manually. | YES |
| A | 海岸線等深線等 | 浅所危険界 |  | P基本線 | Polygon, MultiPolygon | 31,537 | 浅所危険界 | hazard | obstacle | Shoal hazard boundary may be treated as hazard extent, boundary object, or bathymetry support; requires explicit confirmation. | YES |
| A | 漁具定置箇所 | 区画漁業 |  | P漁具定置箇所 | Polygon, MultiPolygon | 19,025 | 区画漁業 | fishery | fishery_area | Fishery extent has entanglement and operational relevance; confirm fishery-area grouping and naming. | YES |
| A | 漁具定置箇所 | 定置漁業 |  | P漁具定置箇所 | Polygon, MultiPolygon | 3,570 | 定置漁業 | fishery | fishery_area | Fixed fishery installations should be checked against other fishery-area types for canonical consolidation. | YES |
| B | 海岸線等深線等 | 浮施設・桟橋 |  | L基本線 / P基本線 | LineString, MultiLineString, Polygon, MultiPolygon | 30,090 | 浮施設・桟橋 | infrastructure | structure | Strong multi-geometry ambiguity across line and area representations; confirm unify vs split between centerline and footprint semantics. | YES |
| B | 海岸線等深線等 | 未測海域 |  | L危険界 / P基本線 | LineString, Polygon, MultiPolygon | 4,554 | 未測海域 | water_area | water_area | Appears both as boundary and area extent; confirm whether unsurveyed-region boundary should be separated from area fill. | YES |
| B | 施設・境界線等 | 海底線 (電信電話) |  | L海底線 | LineString, MultiLineString | 12,817 | 海底線 (電信電話) | utility | utility_line | Utility line can also imply entanglement / anchor risk; confirm utility vs hazard emphasis. | YES |
| B | 施設・境界線等 | 海底輸送管 (水) |  | L海底線 | LineString, MultiLineString | 655 | 海底輸送管 (水) | utility | utility_line | Pipeline semantics are operationally important and come from a container layer; confirm naming and grouping. | YES |
| B | 施設・境界線等 | 養殖場 |  | P施設・境界線等 | Polygon | 716 | 養殖場 | fishery | fishery_area | Fishery object currently originates from a facilities / boundary container layer; confirm semantic extraction is correct. | YES |
| B | 施設・境界線等 | 漁網 |  | P施設・境界線等 | Polygon | 178 | 漁網 | fishery | fishery_area | Net-related entanglement risk should be confirmed as fishery semantics rather than generic facility content. | YES |
| B | 航路 | 航路 (法律による航路) |  | L航路 / P航路 | LineString, Polygon, MultiPolygon | 404 | 航路 (法律による航路) | route | route_reference | Legal route appears as line and area; confirm whether centerline guidance and regulated area should be split. | YES |
| C |  |  |  | P基本線ククリ | LineString, MultiLineString | 1,080,780 | P基本線ククリ | overlay_support | render_support | High-volume clip / outline layer likely acts as rendering support rather than semantic object content. | YES |
| C |  |  |  | P危険界ククリ | LineString, MultiLineString | 51,962 | P危険界ククリ | overlay_support | render_support | Source-preserved hazard-outline layer; confirm it should stay container / render-only. | YES |
| C |  |  |  | P投錨注意障害物ククリ | LineString, MultiLineString | 8,743 | P投錨注意障害物ククリ | overlay_support | render_support | Outline layer around anchoring hazards may be symbolic support rather than independent semantic object. | YES |
| C |  |  |  | P航路ククリ | LineString, MultiLineString | 864 | P航路ククリ | overlay_support | render_support | Route clip / outline layer should likely remain render support; confirm no semantic promotion is needed. | YES |
| C |  |  |  | L海底地形 | LineString, MultiLineString | 2,075,172 | L海底地形 | overlay_support | render_support | Very large source-preserved layer may be bathymetry render support rather than end-user semantic taxonomy. | YES |
| C |  |  |  | p地名 | Point | 36,247 | p地名 | overlay_support | render_support | Label layer behaves as background annotation support, not operational semantic object content. | NO |
| C |  |  |  | p地名陸 | Point | 35,388 | p地名陸 | overlay_support | render_support | Label layer behaves as background annotation support, not operational semantic object content. | NO |
| C |  |  |  | P穴 | Polygon, MultiPolygon | 367,217 | P穴 | overlay_support | render_support | Land-mask support layer appears stable as rendering support and does not currently require semantic taxonomy splitting. | NO |

## 4 Ambiguity Categories

### Multi-Geometry Ambiguity

Current high-value multi-geometry objects include:

- 浮施設・桟橋: 30,090 features across `LineString`, `MultiLineString`, `Polygon`, `MultiPolygon`
- 険悪物: 26,836 features across `Point`, `Polygon`, `MultiPolygon`
- 魚礁: 16,608 features across `Point`, `Polygon`, `MultiPolygon`
- 未測海域: 4,554 features across `LineString`, `Polygon`, `MultiPolygon`
- 航路 (法律による航路): 404 features across `LineString`, `Polygon`, `MultiPolygon`
- 錨泊 (指定)地: 234 features across `Point`, `Polygon`

Primary review question: should these remain one canonical object with mixed geometry support, or should point-symbol, line-boundary, and area-extent variants be split into separate semantic objects?

### Navigation Meaning Ambiguity

The following objects directly affect collision, grounding, anchor, or entanglement reasoning and should be reviewed first:

- 暗岩
- 洗岩
- 干出岩
- 険悪物
- 魚礁
- 浅所危険界
- 漁網
- 養殖場
- 海底線 / 海底輸送管

Primary review question: does each object belong in `hazard`, `fishery`, `utility`, or another family when detection behavior is considered?

### Source Layer Container Ambiguity

The current layer rules identify several likely container layers:

- `P基本線`: `container_layer`, 34 semantic object types, 701,625 features
- `P施設・境界線等`: `container_layer`, 16 semantic object types, 6,425 features
- `L海底線`: `container_layer`, 5 semantic object types, 14,391 features
- `L基本線`: `container_layer`, 5 semantic object types, 53,615 features

Primary review question: should these layers remain source-preserved render containers while downstream products use extracted semantic objects instead?

### Regulatory / Boundary Ambiguity

Objects with strong legal or control semantics include:

- 港則法による境界
- 航路 (法律による航路)
- 錨泊 (指定)地
- 浅所危険界
- 未測海域

Primary review question: should regulatory boundary geometry and filled-area geometry be modeled as the same object type or as separate rule / extent objects?

## 5 First-Pass Recommended Review Scope

Focus first on classes and layers most similar to the task brief:

- 航行危険障害物
- 投錨注意障害物
- 航路標識点
- 航路境界等 / 航路 (法律による航路)
- 錨泊地等
- 施設・境界線等
- 海岸線等深線等 / 海岸線等深線等小縮尺版
- 漁具定置箇所

Recommended first-pass order:

1. Confirm hazard objects and shoal / reef / wreck naming
2. Confirm navigation-mark subtype normalization
3. Confirm anchorage, route, and regulatory boundary grouping
4. Confirm fishery and utility objects extracted from container layers
5. Confirm which clip / support layers remain render-only

## 6 Proposed Review Decisions

| Candidate Object | Suggested canonical_object_type | Suggested canonical_family | Suggested detection_class | Reason | Manual confirmation required |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 険悪物 | 険悪物 | hazard | obstacle | Large mixed point / area hazard set; important to decide whether symbol and extent remain unified. | YES |
| 魚礁 | 魚礁 | hazard | obstacle | Could be treated as hazard, fishery, or hybrid operational object depending on downstream use. | YES |
| 暗岩 / 洗岩 / 干出岩 | Keep as separate named hazard objects | hazard | obstacle | Distinct rock-hazard names are meaningful for chart interpretation and should not be collapsed without explicit approval. | YES |
| 浅所危険界 | 浅所危険界 | hazard | obstacle | Current suggestion treats it as hazard extent, but it may need a boundary-style subtype. | YES |
| 灯 (Lt) and light subtypes | Normalize under light / navigation mark family while preserving subtype label | navigation_aid | navigation_mark | Many shape-driven names likely belong to a common aid-to-navigation family with subtype metadata. | YES |
| 錨泊 (指定)地 | 錨泊 (指定)地 | anchorage | anchorage | Point annotation and polygon extent probably represent the same concept, but a split between label and area remains plausible. | YES |
| 港則法による境界 | 港則法による境界 | boundary | boundary_control | Legal boundary semantics justify keeping a distinct boundary object if user confirms. | YES |
| 航路 (法律による航路) | 航路 (法律による航路) | route | route_reference | Line and polygon forms may need separate centerline and regulated-area objects. | YES |
| 浮施設・桟橋 | 浮施設・桟橋 | infrastructure | structure | Strong line / area dual representation suggests a possible split into linear and areal facility objects. | YES |
| 未測海域 | 未測海域 | water_area | water_area | Boundary plus filled-area modeling should be reviewed before finalizing canonical geometry rules. | YES |
| 海底線 / 海底輸送管 | Keep separate utility object types by infrastructure kind | utility | utility_line | Operationally relevant and extracted from a container layer; keep distinct unless user prefers a broader subsea-utility object. | YES |
| 区画漁業 / 定置漁業 / 養殖場 / 漁網 | Keep as fishery-area objects with subtype distinction | fishery | fishery_area | These support entanglement-aware review and likely should stay distinct within one fishery family. | YES |
| P基本線ククリ and similar `ククリ` layers | Keep as source-preserved render support | overlay_support | render_support | Current evidence suggests these are clip / outline / render-control layers rather than semantic end objects. | YES |
| p地名 / p地名陸 / P穴 | Keep as render-support / background objects | overlay_support | render_support | These appear stable and low-risk as non-semantic support layers. | NO |

## 7 Layer Review Appendix

| source_layer | semantic_granularity | current_rule_guess | review_reason | needs_manual_review |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| P基本線 | container_layer | Container surface layer feeding bathymetry, hazard, water-area, and facility objects | Very high semantic fan-out: 34 object types across 701,625 features. | YES |
| P施設・境界線等 | container_layer | Container surface layer for facilities, boundaries, fishery, and place objects | Mixed semantic content suggests it should remain a container layer rather than a single semantic layer. | YES |
| L海底線 | container_layer | Container linear layer for cable and pipeline objects | Contains multiple subsea utility types with shared rendering source. | YES |
| L基本線 | container_layer | Container linear layer for piers, berths, removed objects, and linear marine structures | Same source layer mixes several operationally different linear object types. | YES |
| p航路標識群 | semantic_layer | Stable semantic point layer with shape-driven navigation-mark subtypes | Semantic layer is good, but subtype normalization still needs manual confirmation. | YES |
| p投錨注意障害物 | semantic_layer | Stable semantic hazard layer with mixed object meanings | Contains hazards, reefs, current phenomena, and seabed-related points that may need family confirmation. | YES |
| p航行危険障害物 | semantic_layer | Stable semantic hazard layer | High-priority safety layer; naming and family assignments should be checked even if the layer itself stays semantic. | YES |
| P錨泊地等 | semantic_layer | Semantic area layer for anchorage and restriction objects | Needs confirmation that point and area anchorage variants are modeled consistently. | YES |
| L等深線 | semantic_layer | Stable contour layer | Geometry behavior looks expected for contour lines; low ambiguity. | NO |
| p地名 | style_or_source_layer | Source-preserved label layer | Background label support; not currently a semantic review focus. | NO |
| p地名陸 | style_or_source_layer | Source-preserved land label layer | Background label support; not currently a semantic review focus. | NO |
| P穴 | style_or_source_layer | Source-preserved area support layer | Stable render-support role; no strong evidence for semantic promotion. | NO |

## 8 Review Outcome Guidance

Please confirm the following decisions after manual review:

1. Confirm canonical object naming for hazards, aids to navigation, route controls, anchorage objects, fishery objects, and utility objects.
2. Confirm family grouping for ambiguous objects such as `魚礁`, `浅所危険界`, `未測海域`, and subsea infrastructure.
3. Confirm detection grouping, especially where the current suggestion uses `obstacle`, `navigation_mark`, `anchorage`, `boundary_control`, `utility_line`, or `fishery_area`.
4. Confirm geometry unification rules for mixed point / line / area objects such as `浮施設・桟橋`, `険悪物`, `魚礁`, `未測海域`, `航路 (法律による航路)`, and `錨泊 (指定)地`.
5. Confirm which source layers remain container or render-support layers, especially `P基本線`, `P施設・境界線等`, `L海底線`, `L基本線`, and the `ククリ` layers.