diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md index f4fe6bb..3e8934d 100644 --- a/AGENTS.md +++ b/AGENTS.md @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ For the current 20nm visual baseline, prefer: - [`navsea_strict_audit.py`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/navsea_strict_audit.py) - [`strict_audit_hotspots_20nm.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/strict_audit_hotspots_20nm.json) +- [`strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json) - visual review page: - `http://192.168.200.184/newpec/navsea-compare-karatsu-20nm.html` @@ -125,6 +126,13 @@ Even when 10nm delivery is rebuilt and audited: - use `10nm` as the object-level backend audit reference only - do not silently switch the user's visual review baseline away from `20nm compare` +For small-scope image audit experiments: + +- keep the style under test fixed to: + - [`src/pbf/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/src/pbf/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json) +- prefer the 3-hotspot pilot config first +- use full hotspot coverage only when pilot hotspots are no longer enough + This script combines: - browser-rendered screenshot diff from the fixed compare page diff --git a/NavSea_20nm_Small_Scope_Audit_Method.md b/NavSea_20nm_Small_Scope_Audit_Method.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1c83bc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/NavSea_20nm_Small_Scope_Audit_Method.md @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +# NavSea 20nm Small Scope Audit Method + +## Goal + +用小范围图像对比去服务两件事： + +- 整理出当前继续收敛的唯一 `style.json` +- 建立一套比“只看后台数字”更可信的审计方法 + +这份方法不追求一次解释全部问题，只服务当前固定视觉基线： + +- compare page: + - `http://192.168.200.184/newpec/navsea-compare-karatsu-20nm.html` + +## Current Style Under Test + +当前继续整理、继续改的唯一 style 文件是： + +- repo source: + - [`src/pbf/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/src/pbf/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json) +- deployed copy: + - `/mnt/sda1/www/newpec/domain/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json` + +说明： + +- 虽然文件名里仍写着 `10nm` +- 但当前 `20nm compare` 右侧实际就是用这份 style +- 所以后续视觉复原应继续收敛这一个文件 +- 不再新增新的 delivery style 主文件，除非明确要分叉方案 + +## Why Small Scope + +整屏图像 diff 太粗，只能说明“还是不一样”。 + +当前更有效的方法是： + +- 只盯 3 个代表性热点 +- 每个热点绑定一类 backend 容易误判的问题 +- 用小范围截图 + 点击拾取 + backend issue family 一起判断 + +这样做的目的不是追求一个漂亮的整屏 diff 数字，而是： + +- 让 style 修改有明确观察点 +- 让 backend audit 的问题项能和肉眼问题真正对应上 + +## Pilot Hotspots + +当前试验版热点配置文件： + +- [`strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json) + +这 3 个热点分别代表： + +1. `takashima_main_harbor_marks` + - 看灯塔、小灯、红绿标识、近岸航标 + - 对应 backend: + - `p航路標識群` + - `safety_icon_missing` + - `text_missing_in_engineering` + +2. `takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards` + - 看鱼礁、碍航点、近岸混合符号 + - 对应 backend: + - `p投錨注意障害物` + - `p航行危険障害物` + - `p航路標識群` + +3. `east_breakwater_marks` + - 看远一点的防波堤灯台、港口标记 + - 对应 backend: + - `p航路標識群` + - `safety_icon_missing` + +## Pilot Run + +当前试验版报告： + +- [`report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.md`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.md) +- [`report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.json) + +热点截图目录： + +- [`report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots) + +本轮试验结果： + +- `takashima_main_harbor_marks` + - changed ratio: `0.783759` +- `takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards` + - changed ratio: `0.744246` +- `east_breakwater_marks` + - changed ratio: `0.617833` + +当前解读： + +- 这 3 个热点都足够敏感，能稳定反映当前 style 还没有复原到位 +- 其中主港航标区最适合做第一优先级视觉回归观察点 +- 东侧防波堤区差异最小，适合做“有没有被新改动误伤”的回归点 + +## Trustworthy Audit Method + +当前建议的可信审计方法是四件事一起用： + +1. 固定视觉页面 + - 只看 `20nm compare` + +2. 小范围 AOI 图像审计 + - 只跑固定热点，不看整屏大 diff 做结论 + +3. 点击拾取 + - 在 compare 页里点具体对象 + - 看右侧实际命中的 `source`、`source-layer`、`render layer` 和属性 + +4. 对象级 backend audit + - 用 `10nm rerun` 那套可回对口径 + - 主要检查： + - `missing` + - `extra` + - `mismatch` + +## Decision Rule + +以后判断一次 style 修改是否可信，按这个顺序： + +1. 修改 [`src/pbf/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/src/pbf/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json) +2. 部署到 `/mnt/sda1/www/newpec/domain/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json` +3. 用固定页面肉眼看 3 个 pilot hotspots +4. 跑一次： + +```bash +python3 navsea_strict_audit.py \ + --hotspots-json /root/sourceserver/pbf/strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json \ + --output-dir /root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot +``` + +5. 对热点里仍然不对的对象做点击拾取 +6. 再决定问题属于： + - style 表达式问题 + - sprite / runtime 问题 + - delivery PBF 语义字段不足，需要回 builder + +## Current Conclusion + +当前已经可以固定下来的东西是： + +- 视觉基线： + - `http://192.168.200.184/newpec/navsea-compare-karatsu-20nm.html` +- style source of truth: + - [`src/pbf/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/src/pbf/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json) +- 小范围试验审计： + - [`strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json) +- 可信方法： + - `20nm compare 肉眼审图 + 小范围 AOI 图像对比 + 点击拾取 + 10nm 对象级 backend audit` + +这套方法比“只看 20nm backend 总数”更可信，也比“只看整屏图像 diff”更可操作。 diff --git a/STEP_RECORD.md b/STEP_RECORD.md index 5deb478..86062fa 100644 --- a/STEP_RECORD.md +++ b/STEP_RECORD.md @@ -887,6 +887,71 @@ Style 语义专项里仍最重要的是： - 严格对象级 render audit - 检查 `missing / extra / mismatch` +## Small Scope Image Audit Pilot + +本轮已把“小范围图像对比测试”正式跑通，目的有两个： + +- 整理出当前继续收敛的唯一 `style.json` +- 建立一个更可信的视觉审计方法 + +当前固定的 style source of truth： + +- [`src/pbf/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/src/pbf/style.navsea-delivery-karatsu-10nm.json) + +虽然名字里仍是 `10nm`，但当前 `20nm compare` 右侧实际就是用它，因此： + +- 后续继续收敛这一个 delivery style 文件 +- 不再新增新的主 delivery style 文件来分散口径 + +本轮新增的小范围热点配置： + +- [`strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json) + +它只保留 3 个最代表当前问题的热点： + +1. `takashima_main_harbor_marks` +2. `takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards` +3. `east_breakwater_marks` + +试验版输出： + +- [`report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.md`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.md) +- [`report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.json`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.json) +- [`report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots) + +本轮 pilot 结果： + +- `takashima_main_harbor_marks` + - changed ratio: `0.783759` +- `takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards` + - changed ratio: `0.744246` +- `east_breakwater_marks` + - changed ratio: `0.617833` + +当前判断： + +- 这 3 个热点足够小，也足够稳定 +- 它们比整屏 diff 更适合指导 style 迭代 +- 其中： + - `takashima_main_harbor_marks` 适合作为第一主观察点 + - `east_breakwater_marks` 适合作为回归保护点 + +本轮也补了一份方法文档： + +- [`NavSea_20nm_Small_Scope_Audit_Method.md`](/root/sourceserver/pbf/NavSea_20nm_Small_Scope_Audit_Method.md) + +当前认可的“可信审计方法”是： + +- `20nm compare` 肉眼审图 +- 小范围 AOI 图像对比 +- compare 页点击拾取 +- `10nm rerun` 对象级 backend audit + +而不是： + +- 只看整屏图像 diff +- 或只看 `20nm` backend 总量数字 + ## Quick Resume Prompt 下次开机如果要快速接上，可以先看这份文件，再按下面这句继续： diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_diff.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_diff.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d28a3ea Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_diff.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_full.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_full.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f401c31 Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_full.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_left.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_left.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..769b817 Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_left.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_right.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_right.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1daf98e Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_right.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_diff.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_diff.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..57df538 Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_diff.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_left.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_left.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c60b5bb Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_left.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_right.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_right.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7a08ac2 Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_right.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_diff.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_diff.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..beb7570 Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_diff.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_left.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_left.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..af49485 Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_left.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_right.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_right.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..361d398 Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_right.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_diff.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_diff.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3588bba Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_diff.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_left.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_left.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2e4c956 Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_left.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_right.png b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_right.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9307acb Binary files /dev/null and b/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_right.png differ diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.json b/report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b901dbe --- /dev/null +++ b/report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.json @@ -0,0 +1,323 @@ +{ + "compare_url": "http://192.168.200.184/newpec/navsea-compare-karatsu-20nm.html", + "compare_version": "20nm-r7-20260331-2044", + "backend_audit_json": "/root/sourceserver/pbf/NavSea_Original_vs_Delivery_Render_Audit_Karatsu_20nm_2026-03-31.r7.json", + "visual_metrics": { + "image_width": 640, + "image_height": 400, + "total_pixels": 256000, + "changed_pixels": 230361, + "changed_ratio": 0.899848, + "mean_abs_rgb": [ + 27.394, + 28.0012, + 51.399 + ], + "rms_rgb": [ + 42.1614, + 40.8117, + 66.9404 + ], + "diff_bbox": [ + 0, + 0, + 640, + 400 + ], + "full_crop_left": [ + 0, + 150, + 640, + 550 + ], + "full_crop_right": [ + 640, + 150, + 1280, + 550 + ], + "hotspots": [ + { + "image_width": 147, + "image_height": 80, + "total_pixels": 11760, + "changed_pixels": 9217, + "changed_ratio": 0.783759, + "mean_abs_rgb": [ + 25.8832, + 26.3819, + 35.8165 + ], + "rms_rgb": [ + 40.7513, + 43.6982, + 55.4931 + ], + "diff_bbox": [ + 0, + 0, + 147, + 80 + ], + "id": "takashima_main_harbor_marks", + "label": "高岛主港航标区", + "notes": "主港口灯塔、红绿标识、近岸障碍标记。优先验证灯塔、小灯、红绿标识是否真正恢复。", + "backend_focus": [ + "p航路標識群", + "safety_icon_missing", + "text_missing_in_engineering" + ], + "pane_box_norm": [ + 0.34, + 0.05, + 0.57, + 0.25 + ], + "pane_box_pixels": [ + 218, + 20, + 365, + 100 + ], + "left_image": "/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_left.png", + "right_image": "/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_right.png", + "diff_image": "/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_diff.png" + }, + { + "image_width": 115, + "image_height": 68, + "total_pixels": 7820, + "changed_pixels": 5820, + "changed_ratio": 0.744246, + "mean_abs_rgb": [ + 26.0925, + 28.3926, + 32.3252 + ], + "rms_rgb": [ + 40.8552, + 45.3891, + 51.1523 + ], + "diff_bbox": [ + 0, + 0, + 115, + 68 + ], + "id": "takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards", + "label": "高岛近岸碍航与鱼礁区", + "notes": "近岸鱼礁、碍航点、灯塔与小灯混合区。优先验证鱼礁和碍航物是否还在。", + "backend_focus": [ + "p投錨注意障害物", + "p航行危険障害物", + "p航路標識群" + ], + "pane_box_norm": [ + 0.44, + 0.14, + 0.62, + 0.31 + ], + "pane_box_pixels": [ + 282, + 56, + 397, + 124 + ], + "left_image": "/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_left.png", + "right_image": "/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_right.png", + "diff_image": "/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_diff.png" + }, + { + "image_width": 109, + "image_height": 64, + "total_pixels": 6976, + "changed_pixels": 4310, + "changed_ratio": 0.617833, + "mean_abs_rgb": [ + 14.5257, + 14.9903, + 20.7008 + ], + "rms_rgb": [ + 30.1275, + 32.1947, + 39.6306 + ], + "diff_bbox": [ + 0, + 4, + 109, + 64 + ], + "id": "east_breakwater_marks", + "label": "东侧防波堤灯台区", + "notes": "防波堤灯台和港口标记区。优先验证远一点的灯台/航标是否也能稳定打出来。", + "backend_focus": [ + "p航路標識群", + "safety_icon_missing" + ], + "pane_box_norm": [ + 0.83, + 0.0, + 1.0, + 0.16 + ], + "pane_box_pixels": [ + 531, + 0, + 640, + 64 + ], + "left_image": "/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_left.png", + "right_image": "/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_right.png", + "diff_image": "/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_diff.png" + } + ] + }, + "backend_summary": { + "original_feature_instances": 258317, + "engineering_feature_instances": 258317, + "result_count": 516634, + "status_counts": { + "extra_in_engineering": 258317, + "missing_in_engineering": 258317 + }, + "top_annotation_issues": [ + { + "issue": "extra_text_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "bathymetry_line", + "count": 24168 + }, + { + "issue": "text_missing_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "L海底地形", + "count": 24168 + }, + { + "issue": "extra_text_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "depth_contour", + "count": 11929 + }, + { + "issue": "text_missing_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "L等深線", + "count": 11929 + }, + { + "issue": "extra_text_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "seabed_text_point", + "count": 4499 + }, + { + "issue": "text_missing_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "p底質", + "count": 4499 + }, + { + "issue": "extra_text_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "navigation_marks", + "count": 1516 + }, + { + "issue": "text_missing_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "p航路標識群", + "count": 1516 + }, + { + "issue": "text_missing_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "p地名", + "count": 1444 + }, + { + "issue": "extra_text_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "place_label_sea", + "count": 1444 + } + ], + "top_style_semantic_issues": [ + { + "issue": "depth_numeric_missing", + "source_layer": "L海底地形", + "count": 24168 + }, + { + "issue": "depth_numeric_missing", + "source_layer": "L等深線", + "count": 11929 + }, + { + "issue": "safety_icon_missing", + "source_layer": "p航路標識群", + "count": 1885 + }, + { + "issue": "depth_numeric_missing", + "source_layer": "L概略等深線", + "count": 350 + }, + { + "issue": "clearance_numeric_missing", + "source_layer": "p高さ制限", + "count": 33 + } + ], + "top_source_layer_issues": [ + { + "status": "extra_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "baseline_outline", + "count": 87709 + }, + { + "status": "missing_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "P基本線ククリ", + "count": 87709 + }, + { + "status": "extra_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "baseline_area", + "count": 50421 + }, + { + "status": "missing_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "P基本線", + "count": 50421 + }, + { + "status": "extra_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "depth_contour", + "count": 36460 + }, + { + "status": "missing_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "L等深線", + "count": 36460 + }, + { + "status": "extra_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "bathymetry_line", + "count": 35940 + }, + { + "status": "missing_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "L海底地形", + "count": 35940 + }, + { + "status": "extra_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "onshore_structure_line", + "count": 10544 + }, + { + "status": "missing_in_engineering", + "source_layer": "L陸上構造物陸", + "count": 10544 + } + ] + }, + "notes": [ + "Visual metrics are browser-rendered screenshot diff metrics from the fixed compare page.", + "Backend metrics are current render-audit summary metrics and may remain blind to sprite-load failures." + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.md b/report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e8039af --- /dev/null +++ b/report/strict_audit_pilot/strict_audit_summary.md @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +# NavSea Strict Audit Summary + +## Scope + +- Compare page: `http://192.168.200.184/newpec/navsea-compare-karatsu-20nm.html` +- Compare version: `20nm-r7-20260331-2044` +- Backend render audit: `/root/sourceserver/pbf/NavSea_Original_vs_Delivery_Render_Audit_Karatsu_20nm_2026-03-31.r7.json` + +## Visual Audit + +- changed pixels: `230361` / `256000` +- changed ratio: `0.899848` +- mean abs rgb: `[27.394, 28.0012, 51.399]` +- rms rgb: `[42.1614, 40.8117, 66.9404]` +- left crop: `[0, 150, 640, 550]` +- right crop: `[640, 150, 1280, 550]` + +Artifacts: + +- `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_full.png` +- `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_left.png` +- `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_right.png` +- `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/compare_diff.png` + +## Hotspot AOI Audit + +### 高岛主港航标区 + +- id: `takashima_main_harbor_marks` +- notes: `主港口灯塔、红绿标识、近岸障碍标记。优先验证灯塔、小灯、红绿标识是否真正恢复。` +- backend focus: `['p航路標識群', 'safety_icon_missing', 'text_missing_in_engineering']` +- changed pixels: `9217` / `11760` +- changed ratio: `0.783759` +- mean abs rgb: `[25.8832, 26.3819, 35.8165]` +- pane box norm: `[0.34, 0.05, 0.57, 0.25]` +- pane box pixels: `[218, 20, 365, 100]` +- left image: `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_left.png` +- right image: `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_right.png` +- diff image: `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_main_harbor_marks_diff.png` + +### 高岛近岸碍航与鱼礁区 + +- id: `takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards` +- notes: `近岸鱼礁、碍航点、灯塔与小灯混合区。优先验证鱼礁和碍航物是否还在。` +- backend focus: `['p投錨注意障害物', 'p航行危険障害物', 'p航路標識群']` +- changed pixels: `5820` / `7820` +- changed ratio: `0.744246` +- mean abs rgb: `[26.0925, 28.3926, 32.3252]` +- pane box norm: `[0.44, 0.14, 0.62, 0.31]` +- pane box pixels: `[282, 56, 397, 124]` +- left image: `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_left.png` +- right image: `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_right.png` +- diff image: `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards_diff.png` + +### 东侧防波堤灯台区 + +- id: `east_breakwater_marks` +- notes: `防波堤灯台和港口标记区。优先验证远一点的灯台/航标是否也能稳定打出来。` +- backend focus: `['p航路標識群', 'safety_icon_missing']` +- changed pixels: `4310` / `6976` +- changed ratio: `0.617833` +- mean abs rgb: `[14.5257, 14.9903, 20.7008]` +- pane box norm: `[0.83, 0.0, 1.0, 0.16]` +- pane box pixels: `[531, 0, 640, 64]` +- left image: `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_left.png` +- right image: `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_right.png` +- diff image: `/root/sourceserver/pbf/report/strict_audit_pilot/hotspots/east_breakwater_marks_diff.png` + +## Backend Render Audit + +- original feature instances: `258317` +- delivery feature instances: `258317` +- result count: `516634` + +Status counts: + +- `extra_in_engineering`: `258317` +- `missing_in_engineering`: `258317` + +Top annotation issues: + +- `extra_text_in_engineering` | `bathymetry_line` | `24168` +- `text_missing_in_engineering` | `L海底地形` | `24168` +- `extra_text_in_engineering` | `depth_contour` | `11929` +- `text_missing_in_engineering` | `L等深線` | `11929` +- `extra_text_in_engineering` | `seabed_text_point` | `4499` +- `text_missing_in_engineering` | `p底質` | `4499` +- `extra_text_in_engineering` | `navigation_marks` | `1516` +- `text_missing_in_engineering` | `p航路標識群` | `1516` +- `text_missing_in_engineering` | `p地名` | `1444` +- `extra_text_in_engineering` | `place_label_sea` | `1444` + +Top style semantic issues: + +- `depth_numeric_missing` | `L海底地形` | `24168` +- `depth_numeric_missing` | `L等深線` | `11929` +- `safety_icon_missing` | `p航路標識群` | `1885` +- `depth_numeric_missing` | `L概略等深線` | `350` +- `clearance_numeric_missing` | `p高さ制限` | `33` + +## Interpretation + +- This report intentionally puts browser-rendered visual output and backend render-audit summary in one place. +- If the browser screenshot improves but backend counts do not, the current backend audit is likely blind to a browser/runtime issue such as sprite resolution. diff --git a/strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json b/strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..21a57b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/strict_audit_hotspots_20nm_pilot.json @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +[ + { + "id": "takashima_main_harbor_marks", + "label": "高岛主港航标区", + "notes": "主港口灯塔、红绿标识、近岸障碍标记。优先验证灯塔、小灯、红绿标识是否真正恢复。", + "pane_box_norm": [0.34, 0.05, 0.57, 0.25], + "backend_focus": [ + "p航路標識群", + "safety_icon_missing", + "text_missing_in_engineering" + ] + }, + { + "id": "takashima_inner_nearshore_hazards", + "label": "高岛近岸碍航与鱼礁区", + "notes": "近岸鱼礁、碍航点、灯塔与小灯混合区。优先验证鱼礁和碍航物是否还在。", + "pane_box_norm": [0.44, 0.14, 0.62, 0.31], + "backend_focus": [ + "p投錨注意障害物", + "p航行危険障害物", + "p航路標識群" + ] + }, + { + "id": "east_breakwater_marks", + "label": "东侧防波堤灯台区", + "notes": "防波堤灯台和港口标记区。优先验证远一点的灯台/航标是否也能稳定打出来。", + "pane_box_norm": [0.83, 0.0, 1.0, 0.16], + "backend_focus": [ + "p航路標識群", + "safety_icon_missing" + ] + } +]